I was
reading an article authored by Marc
Rapport, senior writer at Callahan & Associates, called “All
For One or One For All?” comparing the different technology strategies of two credit unions in close proximity to each
other and both relying on select employer based growth. The two Midwest credit
unions are BCU (formerly Baxter Credit Union) and Four Points Federal Credit
Union.
What struck me was how different these two credit unions view their technology strategy and how one of the two credit unions
is completely comfortable allowing their future to be dictated by a company that
may or may not have their best interests at heart.
According to the article, the
reason Four Points Federal Credit Union is willing to allow this level of
control to a third party core data processing vendor is “trust” and “we could have gotten
different components from different companies and then have them dicker with
one another all the time, but I don’t have time for that”. The credit union CEO
goes on to say, “Regarding its new
provider, the agreement stipulates that the credit union will not face any rate
increases throughout the life of its contract. In addition, the credit union’s
staff will also likely benefit from the new system’s enhanced core accounting
functions. The member service pieces are intuitive and seem easy to learn and
use.” He further goes on to say, “This whole idea of
putting all your eggs in one basket can be an issue,” he says. “But I’ll take
that over the alternative of integrating everything and managing different
vendors.”
WOW is all I can say. Let go through
this point by point.
We could have gotten
different components from different companies and then have them dicker with
one another all the time, but I don’t
have time for that”. The credit
union does not have time to effectively manage one of the most important and
most capital intensive areas of their business. Gone are the days you open and staff
a branch, and rely on members to come flocking through the door. The retail financial
services sector is under attack on many fronts. Members/customers expect more.
They expect 24/7 365 access to all banking products, services and transactions.
What can be more important than developing and managing strategy to meet those
expectations in a timely manner? Do not have time for it?
Regarding its new
provider, the agreement stipulates that the credit union will not face any rate
increases throughout the life of its contract. In addition, the credit union’s
staff will also likely benefit from the new system’s enhanced core accounting
functions – WOW no price
increase until the credit union realizes it needs a new solution that they
currently do not offer. Then what is the credit union’s choice, go back to the core
vendor and hope they have the solution and will be fair in the price they
charge (remember they need to make up that price guarantee somewhere) or …… oh
I forgot, they do not want to dicker around with other solution providers. Price
may be important, but can’t be the overriding reason a technology decision is
made. I also love, “the staff will also “likely” benefit from the new
accounting system.” At least a couple of back-office people will be happy.
It is the last statement
that kills me. “This whole idea of putting all your eggs in one basket
can be an issue,” he says. “But I’ll take that over the alternative of
integrating everything and managing different vendors.” – So expediency and lack
of desire to manage vendors and relationship trumps or limits the credit
union’s ability to define and deliver a comprehensive digital strategy.
The coup de grĂ¢ce is “the go-live
date for the new system is April 30, 2015, but that timeframe depends on the
exit negotiations with Fiserv.” How familiar does that sound from the big-box
core data processors, as they jump from one to another?
Unlike Ron Shevlin, (if you do not already, you
should read his blogs, they are very entertaining) who loves skewer
unsuspecting bloggers and article contributors, I bring this article to the
forefront not because I want to attack the credit union CEO. I bring it forth as an example, because what was said by the Four Points Federal Credit Union CEO is so typical of
so many credit union and bank CEOs and executives.
I am not suggesting that all credit
unions need to be as aggressive as BCU in managing its technology strategy, but
I will say that they need to be on that side of the ledger. If you don’t
control how your credit union digitally delivers its products, services and
transactions, then you have little hope of formulating and executing a digital banking strategy
that will satisfy your members/customers and allow you to compete/remain viable.
Dinosaurs were once dominate
creatures, but where are they now? Credit unions and banks that don’t face the rapidly
changing realities of the retail financial services market face the same outcome.
Let’s look a little more closely at the
performance these two credit unions as of June 2014.
BCU – Peer Group
1B+
|
Four Points –
Peer Group 100MM to 200MM
|
|
Member Growth
|
8.59%
|
-5.65%
|
Peer Group Member
Growth
|
6.2%
|
-1.58%
|
Membership growth is generally seen
as an indication of a credit union’s membership satisfaction and/or the credit
union’s ability to meet the needs of their membership. Is BCU’s technology strategy,
which is polar opposite of Four Points’ technology strategy, the reason BCU is
exceeding their peer group in membership growth and Four Points is under
performing compared to their peer group? I don’t know the answer, but it is a
good question that deserves an answer.
Credit unions and banks must become more
invested in their technology strategy and its execution. The CIO of today needs
to be a savvy business leader that is actively involved in shaping the
direction of the credit union, then putting in-place the solutions necessary to
achieve the corporate goals. The CIO of
today needs to be like the orchestra conductor, pulling all the pieces together to
create symphonic harmony. If you are lucky enough to have a CIO like Jeff
Johnson at BCU consider yourself fortunate. They are hard to find and just may just
hold the future success of your credit union in their hands.
Your thoughts here are spot on (except, maybe, for the one about Ron Shevlin).
ReplyDeleteWhat I think a lot of CUs (and banks, for that matter) don't get here is how their technology strategy impacts their business strategy, and vice versa.
If a CU's business strategy requires a set of products/services (or a certain level of quality) that can't be delivered by a single vendor, then the CU HAS TO develop vendor mgmt capabilities, and integrate apps and systems.
But way too many CUs don't have clarity in their biz strategy to guide the tech strategy decisions.
Thanks for the feedback Ron.
ReplyDelete